Machine generated documentation. Contribute to improve quality together.

Overview: What Problem Does gohandlers Solve?

Writing HTTP APIs in Go is enjoyable due to Go’s simplicity, performance, and strong type system. However, as your project grows, managing repetitive boilerplate code quickly becomes a significant pain point. Handlers start looking similar, with the same repeated parsing logic, validation patterns, and response serialization. Even minor changes, like adding a new field or parameter, often require tedious updates across multiple files.

gohandlers addresses these issues directly, streamlining your development process and letting you focus purely on your core logic. Let’s explore precisely what problems gohandlers solves, and why it matters.

🧩 The Problem: Repetitive Boilerplate Code

In typical Go HTTP APIs, each handler often looks like this:

func CreatePet(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
  var req CreatePetRequest

  // Parse JSON body
  if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&req); err != nil {
    http.Error(w, "invalid request body", http.StatusBadRequest)
    return
  }

  // Manual validation
  if req.Name == "" {
    http.Error(w, "name required", http.StatusBadRequest)
    return
  }

  // Business logic
  id, err := store.Create(req.Name, req.Tag)
  if err != nil {
    http.Error(w, "internal error", http.StatusInternalServerError)
    return
  }

  // Response serialization
  resp := struct{ ID string }{ID: id}
  w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
  if err := json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(resp); err != nil {
    http.Error(w, "serialization error", http.StatusInternalServerError)
  }
}

Almost every handler repeats similar logic:

Multiply this by dozens or even hundreds of handlers, and your codebase becomes difficult to maintain, tedious to extend, and prone to inconsistencies.

⚠️ The Hidden Costs of Manual Boilerplate

Manually written boilerplate isn’t just tedious—it leads to real problems:

🚀 How gohandlers Solves This Problem

gohandlers solves this problem by automatically generating the tedious parts of your HTTP handlers. It leverages Go structs and struct tags as a single source of truth, automatically producing:

Instead of repetitive handler code, you simply write clear, concise Go structs:

type CreatePetRequest struct {
  Name string `json:"name"`
  Tag  string `json:"tag"`
}

type CreatePetResponse struct {
  ID string `json:"id"`
}

And your handler becomes streamlined and focused:

func (p *Pets) CreatePet(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
  req := &CreatePetRequest{}
  if err := req.Parse(r); err != nil {
    http.Error(w, err.Error(), http.StatusBadRequest)
    return
  }

  if errs := req.Validate(); len(errs) > 0 {
    w.WriteHeader(http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
    json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(errs)
    return
  }

  id, err := p.store.Create(req.Name, req.Tag)
  if err != nil {
    http.Error(w, "internal error", http.StatusInternalServerError)
    return
  }

  resp := &CreatePetResponse{ID: id}
  if err := resp.Write(w); err != nil {
    http.Error(w, "write failed", http.StatusInternalServerError)
  }
}

Your handler is clean, readable, and purely focused on the business logic. All repetitive parsing, validation, and serialization is handled automatically.

🔥 Benefits of Using gohandlers

Here’s what you gain by adopting gohandlers:

🌟 Who Benefits Most from gohandlers?

🎯 Conclusion: Less Boilerplate, More Business Logic

gohandlers solves the fundamental problem of repetitive, error-prone boilerplate in Go HTTP APIs. By generating code automatically from clear struct definitions, it empowers you to focus entirely on your application’s business logic.

The result? Faster development, cleaner code, fewer bugs, and a more maintainable and enjoyable coding experience.

Give your API development a boost—let gohandlers handle the boring parts, so you don’t have to.

Happy coding! 🚀